Athlon II X4 640 vs E2-7110

Athlon II X4 640 vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 640

4 / 4

2,266

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E2-7110

4 / 4

2,282

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 640 vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 640 vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 640

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike E2-7110.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,266 vs 2,282).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 640.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Athlon II X4 640?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 640 is ahead with 66.7% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Athlon II X4 640 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (28.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X4 640 vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 640

The Athlon II X4 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,266 points. Launch price was $80.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 640 and E2-7110 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 640 versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 640. The Athlon II X4 640 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 640 scores 2,266 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.7% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	Athlon II X4 640	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2048 kB+300%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,266	2,282
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,471	—
Geekbench 6 Single	386	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,332	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 640 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II X4 640	E2-7110
Socket	AM3	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 640) / not specified (E2-7110). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 640 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 640 rivals Core 2 Quad Q8300.