Athlon II X4 640
VS
Core 2 Duo T6570

Athlon II X4 640 vs Core 2 Duo T6570

AMD

Athlon II X4 640

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6570

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 640 is positioned at rank 621 and the Core 2 Duo T6570 is on rank 222, so the Core 2 Duo T6570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 640

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11003%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10397%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7549%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2274%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1801%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1576%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
903%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
891%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
811%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
811%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
802%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
780%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
769%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
766%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
759%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
97%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
97%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
99%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
98%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
99%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
98%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
97%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
96%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6570

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#210
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
387%
#211
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
381%
#212
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
350%
#213
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
349%
#214
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
345%
#216
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
334%
#217
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
320%
#218
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
319%
#219
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
311%
#222
Core 2 Duo T6570
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 640 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T6570 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II X4 640Core 2 Duo T6570
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X4 640Core 2 Duo T6570
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 640 and Core 2 Duo T6570

AMD

Athlon II X4 640

The Athlon II X4 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,266 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6570

The Core 2 Duo T6570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,274 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 640 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6570 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 640 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6570 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 640 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon II X4 640 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6570 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 640 scores 2,266 against the Core 2 Duo T6570's 2,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6570. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 386 vs 246, a 44.3% lead for the Athlon II X4 640 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 640 vs 2 MB on the Core 2 Duo T6570.

FeatureAthlon II X4 640Core 2 Duo T6570
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,266
2,274
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,471
Geekbench 6 Single
386+57%
246
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,332
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 640 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X4 640) and GM45,PM45,GL40 (Core 2 Duo T6570).

FeatureAthlon II X4 640Core 2 Duo T6570
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 640) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6570). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 640 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T6570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 640 rivals Core 2 Quad Q8300; Core 2 Duo T6570 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureAthlon II X4 640Core 2 Duo T6570
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget