
Core i3-3220T

Athlon II X4 605e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3220T is positioned at rank 939 and the Athlon II X4 605e is on rank 923, so the Athlon II X4 605e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3220T
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 605e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($146) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+487%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($146) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3220T and Athlon II X4 605e

Core i3-3220T
The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Athlon II X4 605e
The Athlon II X4 605e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,964 points. Launch price was $102.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3220T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 605e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 605e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 605e — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-3220T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X4 605e uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3220T scores 1,953 against the Athlon II X4 605e's 1,964 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 605e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 465 vs 300, a 43.1% lead for the Core i3-3220T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 605e.
| Feature | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,953 | 1,964 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,140 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 465+55% | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,069 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3220T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 605e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T) and 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X4 605e).
| Feature | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X4 605e). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Athlon II X4 605e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop, Athlon II X4 605e targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.
| Feature | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-3220T launched at $149 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 605e debuted at $143. At current prices ($146 vs $25), the Athlon II X4 605e is $121 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3220T delivers 13.4 pts/$ vs 78.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 605e — making the Athlon II X4 605e the 141.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3220T | Athlon II X4 605e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $143-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $146 | $25-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | 78.6+487% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















