Core i3-3225
VS
A6-4400M

Core i3-3225 vs A6-4400M

Intel

Core i3-3225

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A6-4400M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3225 is positioned at rank 937 and the A6-4400M is on rank 580, so the A6-4400M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3225

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23561%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22263%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16165%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4870%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3857%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3374%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1933%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1907%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1737%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1737%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1717%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1671%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1648%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1641%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1626%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
100%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#940
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
99%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
99%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
99%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
98%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
97%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
96%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
95%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
95%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
95%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-4400M

#568
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
768%
#569
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
757%
#570
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
695%
#571
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
692%
#572
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
685%
#574
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
662%
#575
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
635%
#576
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
634%
#577
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
616%
#580
A6-4400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-3225 leads in gaming performance. However, the A6-4400M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3225A6-4400M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($167)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3225A6-4400M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($167)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3225 and A6-4400M

Intel

Core i3-3225

The Core i3-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $264.

AMD

A6-4400M

The A6-4400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 2,292 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3225 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-4400M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3225 versus 3.2 GHz on the A6-4400M — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-3225 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-3225 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-4400M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3225 scores 2,276 against the A6-4400M's 2,292 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-4400M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 558 vs 313, a 56.3% lead for the Core i3-3225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3225 vs 0 kB on the A6-4400M.

FeatureCore i3-3225A6-4400M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+22%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,276
2,292
Geekbench 6 Single
558+78%
313
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,142
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3225 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-4400M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3225 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i3-3225A6-4400M
Socket
LGA1155
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3225) vs AMD-V (A6-4400M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3225) and Radeon HD 7520G (A6-4400M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3225 targets Budget, A6-4400M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3225 rivals Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W); A6-4400M rivals Core i3-2370M.

FeatureCore i3-3225A6-4400M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Radeon HD 7520G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Laptop