Core i3-3240T
VS
Celeron 2957U

Core i3-3240T vs Celeron 2957U

Intel

Core i3-3240T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron 2957U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3240T is positioned at rank 851 and the Celeron 2957U is on rank 53, so the Celeron 2957U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17552%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16584%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12042%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3628%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2873%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2514%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1440%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1421%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1294%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1294%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1279%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1245%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1227%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1222%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1211%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
99%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
98%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
98%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
96%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2957U

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#41
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
212%
#42
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#43
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#44
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#45
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
189%
#47
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#48
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
175%
#49
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#50
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
170%
#53
Celeron 2957U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3240T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 2957U in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3240TCeleron 2957U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3240TCeleron 2957U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3240T and Celeron 2957U

Intel

Core i3-3240T

The Core i3-3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,078 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 2957U

The Celeron 2957U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3240T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron 2957U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-3240T versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2957U — a 72.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i3-3240T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron 2957U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3240T scores 2,078 against the Celeron 2957U's 2,077 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-3240T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240T vs 2 MB on the Celeron 2957U.

FeatureCore i3-3240TCeleron 2957U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+114%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+107%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,078
2,077
Geekbench 6 Single
284
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3240T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 2957U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3240TCeleron 2957U
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3240T) / VT-x (Celeron 2957U). The Celeron 2957U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core i3-3240T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2957U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2957U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCore i3-3240TCeleron 2957U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget