Core i3-3245
VS
Atom C3558

Core i3-3245 vs Atom C3558

Intel

Core i3-3245

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WW2013
VS
Intel

Atom C3558

4 Cores4 Thrd16 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3245 is positioned at rank 794 and the Atom C3558 is on rank 365, so the Atom C3558 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3245

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15508%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14654%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10640%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3205%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2539%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2221%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1272%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1256%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1143%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1143%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1130%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1084%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1080%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1070%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
98%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
99%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
98%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
98%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
97%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
97%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
97%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
97%
#807
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
96%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3558

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5129%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
968%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
860%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
665%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#365
Atom C3558
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3558 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-3245Atom C3558
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3245 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-3245Atom C3558
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3245 and Atom C3558

Intel

Core i3-3245

The Core i3-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,412 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3245 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3558 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. The Atom C3558 is built on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-3245 scores 2,412 against the Atom C3558's 2,431 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom C3558. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-3245 vs 8 MB on the Atom C3558.

FeatureCore i3-3245Atom C3558
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+55%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
8 MB+167%
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
2,412
2,431
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3245 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3558 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3245 versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 — the Atom C3558 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3245) vs 12 (Atom C3558) — the Core i3-3245 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-3245Atom C3558
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
256 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-3245) / not specified (Atom C3558). The Core i3-3245 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3245 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-3245Atom C3558
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop