Core i3-4000M
VS
A8-5550M

Core i3-4000M vs A8-5550M

Intel

Core i3-4000M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-5550M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4000M is positioned at rank 501 and the A8-5550M is on rank 692, so the Core i3-4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4000M

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
99%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#489
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
653%
#490
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
643%
#491
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
591%
#492
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
588%
#493
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
583%
#495
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
563%
#496
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
540%
#497
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
539%
#498
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
524%
#501
Core i3-4000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5550M

#680
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
972%
#681
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
958%
#682
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
879%
#683
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
875%
#684
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
867%
#686
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
838%
#687
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
803%
#688
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
802%
#689
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
780%
#692
A8-5550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#696
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
99%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#705
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-5550M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-4000M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-4000MA8-5550M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4000MA8-5550M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4000M and A8-5550M

Intel

Core i3-4000M

The Core i3-4000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $225.

AMD

A8-5550M

The A8-5550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,811 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4000M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-5550M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5550M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4000M versus 3.1 GHz on the A8-5550M — a 25.5% clock advantage for the A8-5550M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-4000M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A8-5550M uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4000M scores 1,797 against the A8-5550M's 1,811 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-5550M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4000M vs 0 kB on the A8-5550M.

FeatureCore i3-4000MA8-5550M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,797
1,811
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4000M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-5550M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4000MA8-5550M
Socket
PGA946
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-4000M) / true (A8-5550M). The A8-5550M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Core i3-4000M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5550M rivals Core i3-4000M.

FeatureCore i3-4000MA8-5550M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true