Core i3-4000M
VS
E2-9000

Core i3-4000M vs E2-9000

Intel

Core i3-4000M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E2-9000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4000M is positioned at rank 501 and the E2-9000 is on rank 700, so the Core i3-4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4000M

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
99%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#489
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
653%
#490
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
643%
#491
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
591%
#492
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
588%
#493
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
583%
#495
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
563%
#496
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
540%
#497
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
539%
#498
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
524%
#501
Core i3-4000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9000

#687
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
985%
#688
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
971%
#689
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
891%
#690
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
887%
#691
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
879%
#693
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
849%
#694
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
814%
#695
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
813%
#696
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
791%
#700
E2-9000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#711
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-4000M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-9000 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-4000ME2-9000
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4000ME2-9000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4000M and E2-9000

Intel

Core i3-4000M

The Core i3-4000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $225.

AMD

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4000M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E2-9000's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4000M versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4000M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-4000M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-9000 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4000M scores 1,797 against the E2-9000's 1,787 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4000M.

FeatureCore i3-4000ME2-9000
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+9%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+33%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,797
1,787
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4000M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-9000 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4000ME2-9000
Socket
PGA946
BGA
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0