A8-5550M vs Core i3-4000M

A8-5550M vs Core i3-4000M Performance Spectrum

A8-5550M

4 / 4

1,811

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4000M

2 / 4

1,797

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5550M vs Core i3-4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5550M vs Core i3-4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5550M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G, while Core i3-4000M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4000M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,797 vs 1,811).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5550M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-5550M better than Core i3-4000M?

Yes. A8-5550M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-5550M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-5550M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-5550M still makes the most sense overall. A8-5550M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5550M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5550M vs Core i3-4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5550M

The A8-5550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,811 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-4000M

The Core i3-4000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5550M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4000M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5550M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5550M versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4000M — a 25.5% clock advantage for the A8-5550M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-5550M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4000M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5550M scores 1,811 against the Core i3-4000M's 1,797 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-5550M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5550M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4000M.

Feature	A8-5550M	Core i3-4000M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+29%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,811	1,797

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5550M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4000M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-5550M	Core i3-4000M
Socket	FS1r2	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5550M) / not specified (Core i3-4000M). The A8-5550M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Core i3-4000M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5550M rivals Core i3-4000M.