A8-5550M vs Celeron N4500

A8-5550M vs Celeron N4500 Performance Spectrum

A8-5550M

4 / 4

1,811

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4500

2 / 2

1,817

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5550M vs Celeron N4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5550M vs Celeron N4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5550M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G, while Celeron N4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,811 vs 1,817).
❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Celeron N4500

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5550M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4500 better than A8-5550M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-5550M is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4500 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4500 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5550M vs Celeron N4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5550M

The A8-5550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,811 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5550M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5550M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5550M versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the A8-5550M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-5550M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4500 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5550M scores 1,811 against the Celeron N4500's 1,817 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N4500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5550M vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500.

Feature	A8-5550M	Celeron N4500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+91%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1.5 MB (total)+50%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	1,811	1,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5550M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4500 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-5550M	Celeron N4500
Socket	FS1r2	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5550M) / not specified (Celeron N4500). The A8-5550M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Celeron N4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5550M rivals Core i3-4000M.