A8-5550M vs Core 2 Duo T7100
A8-5550M
Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5550M is positioned at rank 692 and the Core 2 Duo T7100 is on rank 24, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-5550M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5550M and Core 2 Duo T7100
A8-5550M
The A8-5550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,811 points. Launch price was $90.
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Processing Power
The A8-5550M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5550M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5550M versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the A8-5550M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A8-5550M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5550M scores 1,811 against the Core 2 Duo T7100's 1,817 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+17% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,811 | 1,817 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5550M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5550M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — the A8-5550M supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5550M) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100).
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+79900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5550M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100). The A8-5550M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-5550M rivals Core i3-4000M; Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | A8-5550M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-5550M and Core 2 Duo T7100
