Core i3-4012Y
VS
Celeron E3500

Core i3-4012Y vs Celeron E3500

Intel

Core i3-4012Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron E3500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4012Y is positioned at rank 526 and the Celeron E3500 is on rank 778, so the Core i3-4012Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4012Y

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
99%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
98%
#514
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
689%
#515
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
679%
#516
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
623%
#517
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
620%
#518
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
615%
#520
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
593%
#521
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
569%
#522
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
568%
#523
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
553%
#526
Core i3-4012Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14979%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14154%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10277%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3096%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2145%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1229%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1213%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1092%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1062%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1047%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1043%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1034%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
100%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
100%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-4012Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron E3500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4012YCeleron E3500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4012YCeleron E3500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4012Y and Celeron E3500

Intel

Core i3-4012Y

The Core i3-4012Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4012Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E3500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4012Y versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-4012Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4012Y scores 1,278 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron E3500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 485 vs 347, a 33.2% lead for the Core i3-4012Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 988 vs 624 (45.2% advantage for the Core i3-4012Y). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4012Y vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3500.

FeatureCore i3-4012YCeleron E3500
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+80%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (total)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,278
1,290
Geekbench 6 Single
485+40%
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
988+58%
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4012Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4012Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4012Y) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the Core i3-4012Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i3-4012Y) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500).

FeatureCore i3-4012YCeleron E3500
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Core i3-4012Y) vs VT-x (Celeron E3500). The Core i3-4012Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4012Y targets Low Power, Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCore i3-4012YCeleron E3500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power
Budget