Core i3-4120U vs Core i5-2410M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4120U vs Core i5-2410M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4120U vs Core i5-2410M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4120U

2014

Why buy it

✅+4.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Core i5-2410M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (444 vs 462).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (913 vs 1,071).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i3-4120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4120U better than Core i5-2410M?

Yes. Core i3-4120U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.3% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4120U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4120U is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4120U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4120U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2410M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4120U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4120U vs Core i5-2410M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4120U

The Core i3-4120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i5-2410M

The Core i5-2410M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,954 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4120U and Core i5-2410M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4120U versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2410M — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-2410M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-4120U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2410M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4120U scores 1,948 against the Core i5-2410M's 1,954 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-2410M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 462 vs 444, a 4% lead for the Core i3-4120U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,071 vs 913 (15.9% advantage for the Core i3-4120U). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4120U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2410M.

Feature	Core i3-4120U	Core i5-2410M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,948	1,954
Geekbench 6 Single	462+4%	444
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,071+17%	913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4120U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2410M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4120U versus 1333 on the Core i5-2410M — the Core i3-4120U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4120U) vs 16 (Core i5-2410M) — the Core i5-2410M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4120U) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2410M).

Feature	Core i3-4120U	Core i5-2410M
Socket	FCBGA1168	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-4120U) vs true (Core i5-2410M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4120U) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2410M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2410M rivals AMD A8-3500M.