Core i3-4130 vs FX-9830P

Core i3-4130 vs FX-9830P Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4130

2 / 4

3,334

+1.1%

3,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4130 vs FX-9830P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4130 vs FX-9830P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4130

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.5 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while FX-9830P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,298 vs 3,334).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 28.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9830P better than Core i3-4130?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-9830P is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9830P is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-9830P comes in 28.2% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4130 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 29.6% better value on paper (28.5 vs 22.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-9830P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4130 vs FX-9830P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4130

The Core i3-4130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,334 points. Launch price was $120.

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4130 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9830P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-4130 versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 8.5% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-4130 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4130 scores 3,334 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-4130.

Feature	Core i3-4130	FX-9830P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB (per module)+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,334+1%	3,298
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,036	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,046	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4130 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4130	FX-9830P
Socket	LGA1150	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-4130) / not specified (FX-9830P). The Core i3-4130 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130 rivals FX-4130.

Feature	Core i3-4130	FX-9830P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4400	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4130 was priced at $117, while the FX-9830P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($117 vs $150), Core i3-4130 was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4130 delivers 28.5 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the Core i3-4130 the 25.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4130	FX-9830P
MSRP	$117-22%	$150
Performance per Dollar	28.5+30%	22.0
Release Date	2013	2016

Search Core i3-4130 on Amazon

Search FX-9830P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.