A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4130

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4130 Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4130

2 / 4

3,334

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,317 vs 3,334).
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.

Core i3-4130

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while A10 PRO-7800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4130 better than A10 PRO-7800B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10 PRO-7800B is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4130 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10 PRO-7800B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (28.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 PRO-7800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4130

The Core i3-4130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,334 points. Launch price was $120.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4130 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-4130 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4130 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Core i3-4130's 3,334 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4130. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 446 vs 1,046, a 80.4% lead for the Core i3-4130 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i3-4130
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+15%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,317	3,334
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,036
Geekbench 6 Single	446	1,046+135%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4130 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7800B versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130 — the A10 PRO-7800B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7800B) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130).

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i3-4130
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) vs VT-x (Core i3-4130). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7800B) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4130) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-4130 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160; Core i3-4130 rivals FX-4130.