A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon W5590

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon W5590 Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W5590

4 / 8

3,342

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon W5590 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon W5590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon W5590 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W5590.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W5590 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,317 vs 3,342).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W5590, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W5590

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $202 MSRP, while A10 PRO-7800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W5590 better than A10 PRO-7800B?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W5590 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10 PRO-7800B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W5590 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W5590 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W5590 is the better buy right now. Xeon W5590 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $202 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 PRO-7800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon W5590 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon W5590

The Xeon W5590 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,342 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W5590's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W5590 — a 8% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W5590 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Xeon W5590's 3,342 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W5590.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon W5590
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+8%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+5%	3.33 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,317	3,342
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W5590 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon W5590
Socket	FM2+	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Xeon W5590). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W5590 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.