A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3480

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3480 Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3480

4 / 8

3,327

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon X3480 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X3480.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,317 vs 3,327).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3480, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3480

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $612 MSRP, while A10 PRO-7800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Xeon X3480?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3480 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10 PRO-7800B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3480 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 PRO-7800B is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X3480 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A10 PRO-7800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $612 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X3480 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon X3480 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 PRO-7800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3480

The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3480's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 — a 4.5% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X3480 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Xeon X3480's 3,327 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X3480.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon X3480
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.73 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+14%	3.06 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,317	3,327
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3480 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon X3480
Socket	FM2+	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Xeon X3480). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X3480 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.