A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i7-6560U

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i7-6560U Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-6560U

2 / 4

3,347

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i7-6560U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i7-6560U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i7-6560U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6560U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,317 vs 3,347).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Core i7-6560U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6560U better than A10 PRO-7800B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10 PRO-7800B is ahead with a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6560U pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6560U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6560U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-6560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6560U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i7-6560U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-6560U

The Core i7-6560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,347 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-6560U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-6560U — a 19.7% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-6560U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Core i7-6560U's 3,347 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-6560U.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i7-6560U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,317	3,347
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6560U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i7-6560U
Socket	FM2+	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Core i7-6560U). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-6560U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.