
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is positioned at rank 207 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 320% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-320%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+320%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $89), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 211.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+211.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($89) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B and Radeon Pro WX 4150

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B scores 629 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 leads by 320%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 629 | 2,642+320% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+357% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+2435% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+177% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+700% | 16 |
| TMUs | 256+357% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 52.8+2414% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $89, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B costs 25.8% less ($31 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 209.9% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119-60% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $89-26% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1 | 22.0+210% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Baffin |
| Release | July 23 2025 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #23 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















