CPU
GPU
Quadro 6000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 6000 is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 4150 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 4150.
| Insight | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 22.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 6000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150
Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692+2% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 896+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+300% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 6000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Quadro 6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 121.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 52.8+300% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 6000 launched at $4399 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.9 (Quadro 6000) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 22.9% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4399 | $300-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | 22.0+23% |
| Codename | GF100 | Baffin |
| Release | December 10 2010 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #615 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 6000 and Radeon Pro WX 4150
