
FirePro V9800

Quadro 6000
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 204W, a 54W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$3,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ❌36% higher power demand at 204W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727+1% | 2,692 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+186% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+81% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V9800) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 30.5% difference. The FirePro V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-26% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2+38% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, FirePro V9800 was 20.5% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the FirePro V9800 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V9800 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499-20% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8+33% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | GF100 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | December 10 2010 |
| Ranking | #656 | #615 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















