FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000

FirePro V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

2010Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V9800

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $900 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 204W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,399 MSRPvs$3,499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • 36% higher power demand at 204W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V9800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (2,727 vs 2,692), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $900 cheaper on MSRP at $3,499 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.4% (0.8 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V9800

The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).

FeatureFirePro V9800Quadro 6000
G3D Mark Score
2,727+1%
2,692
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280+186%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+81%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80+43%
56
L1 Cache
320 KB
896 KB+180%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V9800Quadro 6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V9800) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V9800Quadro 6000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 30.5% difference. The FirePro V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro V9800Quadro 6000
TDP
150W-26%
204W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
18.2+38%
13.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, FirePro V9800 was 20.5% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the FirePro V9800 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V9800 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V9800Quadro 6000
MSRP
$3499-20%
$4399
Performance per Dollar
0.8+33%
0.6
Codename
Cayman
GF100
Release
May 24 2011
December 10 2010
Ranking
#656
#615

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.