
FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 770M

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V9800 is positioned at rank 368 and the GeForce GTX 770M is on rank 54, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V9800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $250), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 538.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+538.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V9800 and GeForce GTX 770M

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the GeForce GTX 770M reaches 2,784 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 770M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 770M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,784+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+33% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+21% | 1.53 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V9800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 770M has 3 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V9800) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) — the FirePro V9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 770M).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 770M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 37.1+104% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (FirePro V9800) vs 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 538.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 770M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $40-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 69.6+539% |
| Codename | Cayman | GK106 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #656 | #603 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













