FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V9800

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1658.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1684.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (2,768 vs 2,727), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,300 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1684.7% (13.9 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V9800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800

The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score	2,727	2,768+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1280+281%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+70%	1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	320 KB	448 KB+40%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V9800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 carries 1 GB. FirePro V9800 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Encoder	None	—
Decoder	UVD 2.3	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.2	18.5+2%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 was 94.3% cheaper ($3300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 1637.5% better value.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
MSRP	$3499	$199-94%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	13.9+1638%
Codename	Cayman	GF114
Release	May 24 2011	May 17 2011
Ranking	#656	#605

Search FirePro V9800 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.