FirePro V9800 vs GeForce GTX 560

FirePro V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro V9800

150

2,727

0.0%

Radeon Vega 10

Radeon R9 M360

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U

Radeon RX Vega 11 PRD

2,768

+1.5%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V9800 is positioned at rank #368 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800

#353

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

18940%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

100%

#369

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

100%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

91%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

87%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

85%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

83%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

78%

#375

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

78%

#376

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

78%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

77%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

74%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

72%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

72%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

68%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

68%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

60%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V9800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $250), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 745.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+745.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro V9800 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V9800 and GeForce GTX 560

FirePro V9800

The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
G3D Mark Score	2,727	2,768+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1280+281%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+70%	1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	320 KB	448 KB+40%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V9800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560).

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
Encoder	None	—
Decoder	UVD 2.3	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro V9800	GeForce GTX 560
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.2	18.5+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 88% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (FirePro V9800) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 746.8% better value.