FirePro V9800
Quadro K4000
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌175.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$1,269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,230 less on MSRP ($1,269 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($1,269 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,719 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+49% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+400% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 carries 3 GB. FirePro V9800 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V9800) vs 384 KB (Quadro K4000) — the FirePro V9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 80W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 34.0+87% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. On MSRP, Quadro K4000 was 63.7% cheaper ($2230 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 162.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4000 (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $1269-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 2.1+163% |
| Codename | Cayman | GK106 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #656 | #613 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V9800 and Quadro K4000
