
FirePro V9800 vs FirePro 3D V9800

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V9800 is positioned at rank 368 and the FirePro 3D V9800 is on rank 365, so the FirePro 3D V9800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V9800.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V9800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V9800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $250), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 222.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+222.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V9800 and FirePro 3D V9800

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

FirePro 3D V9800
The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the FirePro 3D V9800 reaches 2,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro 3D V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,812+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V9800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs None (FirePro 3D V9800). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V9800).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V9800's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 18.7+3% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the FirePro 3D V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $80. The FirePro 3D V9800 costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (FirePro V9800) vs 35.1 (FirePro 3D V9800) — the FirePro 3D V9800 offers 222% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro 3D V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $80-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 35.1+222% |
| Codename | Cayman | Cayman |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













