
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro 450

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V9800 is positioned at rank #368 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 450.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $250), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 524.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+524.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V9800 and Radeon Pro 450

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,723 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+81% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V9800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V9800) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 77.8+327% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (FirePro V9800) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 524.8% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $40-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 68.1+525% |
| Codename | Cayman | Baffin |
| Release | May 24 2011 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #656 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















