
FirePro V9800

Radeon Pro 450
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro 450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,723 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+81% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. FirePro V9800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V9800) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 77.8+327% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($3499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cayman | Baffin |
| Release | May 24 2011 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #656 | #612 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















