
FirePro 3D V9800
Popular choices:

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro 3D V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro 3D V9800
2011FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro 3D V9800 better than FirePro V9800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro V9800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V9800 and FirePro V9800

FirePro 3D V9800
FirePro 3D V9800
The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the FirePro V9800 reaches 2,727 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1,280 (FirePro V9800). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,812+3% | 2,727 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 11.2 (FirePro V9800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V9800) vs None (FirePro V9800). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the FirePro V9800's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (FirePro V9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 85°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+3% | 18.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V9800 launched at $3499 MSRP, while the FirePro V9800 launched at $3499. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 0.8 (FirePro V9800) — the FirePro V9800 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Codename | Cayman | Cayman |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












