FirePro 3D V9800
GRID K260Q
FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K260Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K260Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K260Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌273.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$937 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $937 MSRP).
GRID K260Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,562 less on MSRP ($937 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 291.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($937 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K260Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 3D V9800
The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.
GRID K260Q
The GRID K260Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,949 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the GRID K260Q reaches 2,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID K260Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1,536 (GRID K260Q). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K260Q).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,812 | 2,949+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K260Q carries 2 GB. FirePro 3D V9800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V9800 and 64-bit on the GRID K260Q.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the GRID K260Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (GRID K260Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+43% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V9800 came in at $3499, while the GRID K260Q launched at $937. On MSRP, GRID K260Q was 73.2% cheaper ($2562 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 3.1 (GRID K260Q) — the GRID K260Q offers 287.5% better value. The newer card here is GRID K260Q (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $937-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 3.1+287% |
| Codename | Cayman | GK104 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #656 | #589 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V9800 and GRID K260Q
