FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

FirePro 3D V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

2018Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V9800

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

  • FirePro 3D V9800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (2,853 vs 2,812), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro 3D V9800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V9800

The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU reaches 2,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU).

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score
2,812
2,853+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 5.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280
3584 ×2+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS ×2+479%
ROPs
32
64 ×2+100%
TMUs
80
224 ×2+180%
L1 Cache
320 KB
896 KB+180%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU carries 2 GB. FirePro 3D V9800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V9800 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
TDP
150W-50%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
18.7+97%
9.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
MSRP
$3499
Codename
Cayman
Vega 10
Release
May 24 2011
August 26 2018
Ranking
#656
#592

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.