FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
FirePro 3D V9800
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V9800 is positioned at rank 365 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is on rank 5, so the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V9800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V9800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V9800 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
FirePro 3D V9800
The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU reaches 2,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,812 | 2,853+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 3584 ×2+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+479% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224 ×2+180% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V9800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V9800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7+97% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #656 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V9800 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
