FirePro 3D V9800 vs Quadro K5000M

FirePro 3D V9800

2011Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

2012Core: 601 MHz

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Quadro K5000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Quadro K5000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V9800

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V9800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,812 vs 2,805), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs Quadro K5000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V9800

The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the Quadro K5000M reaches 2,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro K5000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1,344 (Quadro K5000M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
G3D Mark Score
2,812
2,805
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1344+5%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+15%
1.615 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB+186%
112 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M.

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
DirectX
11.2
12 (11_0)+7%
Vulkan
None
1.2
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5000M).

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
Encoder
None
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro K5000M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (Quadro K5000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 81°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
TDP
150W
100W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90
81°C-10%
Perf/Watt
18.7
28.1+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K5000M (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro 3D V9800Quadro K5000M
MSRP
$3499
Codename
Cayman
GK104
Release
May 24 2011
August 7 2012
Ranking
#656
#600

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.