FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V9800

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
133.4% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,773 vs 2,727), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4100M makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $1,499 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 137.4% (1.8 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4100M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V9800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800

The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	FirePro V9800	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,727	2,773+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+11%	1152
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+14%	1.627 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	96+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V9800	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M.

Feature	FirePro V9800	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro V9800	Quadro K4100M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.2	27.7+52%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, Quadro K4100M was 57.2% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the Quadro K4100M offers 125% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4100M (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V9800	Quadro K4100M
MSRP	$3499	$1499-57%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	1.8+125%
Codename	Cayman	GK104
Release	May 24 2011	July 23 2013
Ranking	#656	#604

Search FirePro V9800 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.