FirePro V9800 vs Quadro K4100M
FirePro V9800
Popular choices:
Quadro K4100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V9800 is positioned at rank 368 and the Quadro K4100M is on rank 52, so the Quadro K4100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4100M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V9800.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V9800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V9800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $250 (vs $261), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 2.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($261) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V9800 and Quadro K4100M
FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Quadro K4100M
The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,773+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+11% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+14% | 1.627 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 27.7+52% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499 and now averages $261. The FirePro V9800 costs 4.2% less ($11 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.9 (FirePro V9800) vs 10.6 (Quadro K4100M) — the FirePro V9800 offers 2.8% better value. The Quadro K4100M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $1499-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-4% | $261 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9+3% | 10.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | GK104 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #656 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V9800 and Quadro K4100M
