
FirePro V9800

FirePro W4300
FirePro V9800 vs FirePro W4300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs FirePro W4300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs FirePro W4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌823.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
- ❌56.1% longer card at 267mm vs 171mm.
FirePro W4300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 820.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 171mm instead of 267mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs FirePro W4300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727 | 2,719 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+30% | 1.428 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the FirePro W4300. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V9800) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro V9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12 (FirePro W4300). Vulkan: None vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2.170 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 171mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 71°C.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 171mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 71°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 54.4+199% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379. On MSRP, FirePro W4300 was 89.2% cheaper ($3120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 7.2 (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro W4300 offers 800% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $379-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 7.2+800% |
| Codename | Cayman | Bonaire |
| Release | May 24 2011 | December 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #590 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















