GRID K2
Quadro 6000
GRID K2 vs Quadro 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K2 vs Quadro 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K2 vs Quadro 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K2
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌18.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,199 MSRPvs$4,399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
Quadro 6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($4,399 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K2 vs Quadro 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Quadro 6000 reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,737+2% | 2,692 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+243% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+123% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 6000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K2 and 64-bit on the Quadro 6000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K2) vs 768 KB (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 204W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 13.2+8% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K2 came in at $5199, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. On MSRP, Quadro 6000 was 15.4% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the Quadro 6000 offers 20% better value. The newer card here is GRID K2 (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5199 | $4399-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
| Codename | GK104 | GF100 |
| Release | May 11 2013 | December 10 2010 |
| Ranking | #611 | #615 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K2 and Quadro 6000
