GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID K2
GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:
GRID K2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID K2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID K2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 169.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+169.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 and GRID K2
GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,768+1% | 2,737 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1536 ×2+357% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+110% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 56 | 128 ×2+129% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+250% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 has 2 GB. The GRID K2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5+52% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 34.2 (GRID K2) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 169.9% better value. The GRID K2 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-96% | $5199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-63% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3+170% | 34.2 |
| Codename | GF114 | GK104 |
| Release | May 17 2011 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #605 | #611 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 and GRID K2
