GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K4100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅9.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 651.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
653.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4100M instead at 2,773 vs 2,768, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,300 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 651.9% (13.9 vs 1.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K4100M
G3D Mark Score	2,768	2,773
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	1152+243%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+49%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	448 KB+367%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K4100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K4100M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K4100M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	18.5	27.7+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 came in at $199, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 was 86.7% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 672.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4100M (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K4100M
MSRP	$199-87%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	13.9+672%	1.8
Codename	GF114	GK104
Release	May 17 2011	July 23 2013
Ranking	#605	#604

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.