
GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (3 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $499), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1528% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1528%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 and Radeon HD 8950

GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Radeon HD 8950 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8950 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,768 | 2,828+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1792+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+163% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8950 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 8950) — the Radeon HD 8950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 3 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 8950's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 500W (Radeon HD 8950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5+31% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 and now averages $499. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 94% less ($469 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 1519.3% better value. The Radeon HD 8950 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-60% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-94% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3+1519% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GF114 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 17 2011 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #605 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













