GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID K280Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID K280Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID K280Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 879.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K280Q

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
905% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K280Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (2,840 vs 2,768), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,801 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 879.5% (13.9 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K280Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 560 vs GRID K280Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the GRID K280Q reaches 2,840 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID K280Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,536 (GRID K280Q). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID K280Q
G3D Mark Score	2,768	2,840+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	1536+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+110%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	448 KB+250%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K280Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID K280Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K280Q carries 2 GB. GRID K280Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the GRID K280Q.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID K280Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the GRID K280Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (GRID K280Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID K280Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	18.5+47%	12.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 came in at $199, while the GRID K280Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 was 90% cheaper ($1801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.4 (GRID K280Q) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 892.9% better value. The newer card here is GRID K280Q (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GRID K280Q
MSRP	$199-90%	$2000
Performance per Dollar	13.9+893%	1.4
Codename	GF114	GK104
Release	May 17 2011	June 28 2013
Ranking	#605	#595

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search GRID K280Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.