GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K5000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K5000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K5000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅7.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K5000M instead at 2,805 vs 2,768, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro K5000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Quadro K5000M reaches 2,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K5000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,344 (Quadro K5000M). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
G3D Mark Score	2,768	2,805+1%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	1344+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	1.615 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	112+100%
L1 Cache	448 KB+300%	112 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000M carries 4 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
Encoder	—	1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder	—	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Quadro K5000M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (Quadro K5000M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	81°C
Perf/Watt	18.5	28.1+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K5000M (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro K5000M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF114	GK104
Release	May 17 2011	August 7 2012
Ranking	#605	#600

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search Quadro K5000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.