GeForce GTX 560 vs GeForce MX350

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 560

2011Core: 810 MHz

GeForce MX350

2020Core: 747 MHzBoost: 937 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 560

150

2,768

0.0%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce MX350

2,828

+2.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350

#338

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

960%

#340

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

870%

#341

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

868%

#345

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

789%

#346

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

784%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

98%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

96%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

94%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

94%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

93%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX350 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 552.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+552.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560 Benchmark Check

GeForce MX350 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 and GeForce MX350

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the GeForce MX350 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce MX350 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 640 (GeForce MX350). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
G3D Mark Score	2,768	2,828+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	336	640+90%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	1.199 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	448 KB+87%	240 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX350 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	56 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX350's 20W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (GeForce MX350). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	GeForce MX350
TDP	150W	20W-87%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Perf/Watt	18.5	141.4+664%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce MX350 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 14.1 (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 554.6% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).