GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro M1000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro M1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro M1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560

2011

Why buy it

✅53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌275% higher power demand at 150W vs 40W.

Quadro M1000M

2015

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 40W instead of 150W, a 110W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M1000M instead at 2,845 vs 2,768, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 vs Quadro M1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560

The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the Quadro M1000M reaches 2,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro M1000M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 512 (Quadro M1000M). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro M1000M
G3D Mark Score	2,768	2,845+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	512+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS+7%	1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	448 KB+75%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M1000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro M1000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 and 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro M1000M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the Quadro M1000M's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (Quadro M1000M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro M1000M
TDP	150W	40W-73%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	18.5	71.1+284%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M1000M (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560	Quadro M1000M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF114	GM107
Release	May 17 2011	August 18 2015
Ranking	#605	#594

Search GeForce GTX 560 on Amazon

Search Quadro M1000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.