FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V9800

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K2

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
48.6% HIGHER MSRP
$5,199 MSRPvs$3,499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro 3D V9800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (2,812 vs 2,737), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V9800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $3,499 vs $5,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.7% (0.8 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 3D V9800 vs GRID K2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V9800

The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).

Feature	FirePro 3D V9800	GRID K2
G3D Mark Score	2,812+3%	2,737
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536 ×2+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+23%
ROPs	32	32 ×2
TMUs	80	128 ×2+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V9800	GRID K2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V9800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 carries 2 GB. FirePro 3D V9800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V9800 and 64-bit on the GRID K2.

Feature	FirePro 3D V9800	GRID K2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro 3D V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro 3D V9800	GRID K2
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90	—
Perf/Watt	18.7+53%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V9800 came in at $3499, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199. On MSRP, FirePro 3D V9800 was 32.7% cheaper ($1700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 0.5 (GRID K2) — the FirePro 3D V9800 offers 60% better value. The newer card here is GRID K2 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro 3D V9800	GRID K2
MSRP	$3499-33%	$5199
Performance per Dollar	0.8+60%	0.5
Codename	Cayman	GK104
Release	May 24 2011	May 11 2013
Ranking	#656	#611

Search FirePro 3D V9800 on Amazon

Search GRID K2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.