CPU
GPU
GRID K2
Popular choices:
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K2 is positioned at rank #381 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K2
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K2.
| Insight | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K2 and Quadro M620
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,737 | 2,758 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+129% | 1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K2) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 91.9+653% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K2 launched at $5199 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Quadro M620 costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.2 (GRID K2) vs 69.0 (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers 101.8% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $40-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.2 | 69.0+102% |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | May 11 2013 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #611 | #606 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K2 and Quadro M620
