GRID K2 vs Radeon Pro 450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K2 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K2 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K2

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (2,737 vs 2,723), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID K2 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	GRID K2	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,737	2,723
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+124%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	32 ×2+100%	16
TMUs	128 ×2+220%	40
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K2	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K2 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K2) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K2	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K2	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	12.2	77.8+538%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K2 came in at $5199, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($5199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K2	Radeon Pro 450
MSRP	$5199	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	Infinity
Codename	GK104	Baffin
Release	May 11 2013	October 30 2016
Ranking	#611	#612

Search GRID K2 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.