
GeForce GTX 770M vs GRID K2

GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:

GRID K2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank 54 and the GRID K2 is on rank 381, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Per Dollar GRID K2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K2

GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,784+2% | 2,737 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 1536 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+50% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 512 KB (GRID K2) — the GRID K2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.1+204% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 34.2 (GRID K2) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 103.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-50% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.6+104% | 34.2 |
| Codename | GK106 | GK104 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #603 | #611 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











