
GeForce GTX 770M vs Radeon R9 M380

GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank 54 and the Radeon R9 M380 is on rank 379, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $300), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 658.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+658.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and Radeon R9 M380

GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,784+1% | 2,752 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+25% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1000 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce GTX 770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 37.1+1% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 656.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-87% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.6+657% | 9.2 |
| Codename | GK106 | Strato |
| Release | May 30 2013 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #603 | #607 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















