GeForce GTX 770M vs GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank 54 and the GeForce MX350 is on rank 348, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX350 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 392.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+392.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the GeForce MX350 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the GeForce MX350 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 640 (GeForce MX350). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 937 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,784 | 2,828+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+50% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS+28% | 1.199 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 937 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 240 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX350 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 512 KB (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce MX350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 56 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the GeForce MX350's 20W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (GeForce MX350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 20W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.1 | 141.4+281% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 14.1 (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 393.6% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-80% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.6+394% | 14.1 |
| Codename | GK106 | GP107 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #603 | #597 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 770M and GeForce MX350
