GeForce GTX 770M vs GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:
GRID K280Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank 54 and the GRID K280Q is on rank 323, so the GeForce GTX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M
Performance Per Dollar GRID K280Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K280Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 22.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.
GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the GRID K280Q reaches 2,840 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the GRID K280Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1,536 (GRID K280Q). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,784 | 2,840+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 1536+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+50% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K280Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 512 KB (GRID K280Q) — the GRID K280Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 11_0 (GRID K280Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the GRID K280Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (GRID K280Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.1+194% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770M costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 56.8 (GRID K280Q) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 22.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.6+23% | 56.8 |
| Codename | GK106 | GK104 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #603 | #595 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 770M and GRID K280Q
