GeForce GTX 770M
VS
Quadro K5000M

GeForce GTX 770M vs Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

2012Core: 601 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank 54 and the Quadro K5000M is on rank 50, so the Quadro K5000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
92%
#44
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
195%
#46
177%
#47
176%
#51
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
160%
#52
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
159%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#65
94%
#66
94%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
98%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
98%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
98%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
89%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
89%
#35
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
527%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
100%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
99%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
99%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
89%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
89%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
85%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 770M.

InsightGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $509), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1163% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1163%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($509)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the Quadro K5000M reaches 2,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the Quadro K5000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1,344 (Quadro K5000M). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
G3D Mark Score
2,784
2,805
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
1344+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.53 TFLOPS
1.615 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
112 KB+40%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000M has 4 GB. The Quadro K5000M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 512 KB (Quadro K5000M) — the Quadro K5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5000M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the Quadro K5000M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (Quadro K5000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 81°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-7%
81°C
Perf/Watt
37.1+32%
28.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 770M costs 92.1% less ($469 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 5.5 (Quadro K5000M) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 1165.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 770M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MQuadro K5000M
Avg Price (30d)
$40-92%
$509
Performance per Dollar
69.6+1165%
5.5
Codename
GK106
GK104
Release
May 30 2013
August 7 2012
Ranking
#603
#600