GRID K2
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
GRID K2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌703.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 28W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 225W, a 197W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,737 | 2,715 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+1820% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs carries 0 MB. GRID K2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K2 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 155.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 28W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 97.0+695% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K2 came in at $5199, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs was 100+% cheaper ($5199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 11 2013 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #611 | #584 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K2 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
