Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

2010Core: 574 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…74.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌482.9% higher power demand at 204W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 204W, a 169W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 450 instead at 2,723 vs 2,692, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureQuadro 6000Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,692
2,723+1%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
448
640+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
896 KB+460%
160 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 6000Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) β€” the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 6000Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W β€” a 141.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro 6000Radeon Pro 450
TDP
204W
35W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
1mm
Slots
β€”
0
Perf/Watt
13.2
77.8+489%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($4399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) β€” the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 6000Radeon Pro 450
MSRP
$4399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.6
Infinity
Codename
GF100
Baffin
Release
December 10 2010
October 30 2016
Ranking
#615
#612

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.