Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 6000
2010Why buy it
- β 74.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- β2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β482.9% higher power demand at 204W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 204W, a 169W reduction.
- β More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 6000 vs Radeon Pro 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692 | 2,723+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 640+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+460% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 carries 2 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) β the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W β a 141.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | β | 1mm |
| Slots | β | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 77.8+489% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($4399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) β the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 6000 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Baffin |
| Release | December 10 2010 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #615 | #612 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















